Every AI Investor Should Watch Nvidia’s Earnings, Here’s Why

Nvidia reports fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter and full-year earnings after market close on Wednesday, February 25th, followed by a conference call between CEO Jensen Huang, management, and Wall Street analysts. For market watchers who have witnessed Nvidia carry the stock market higher in recent years, these events represent pure theater—and potentially major market-moving catalysts.

Earnings reports are always massive events for Nvidia, but not just because of the company’s $4.6 trillion market cap or its role as the dominant AI chip supplier. Investors view Nvidia’s results as a gauge of the entire AI market. When Nvidia reports strong data center revenue and guides higher, it signals that hyperscalers like Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and Google are continuing aggressive AI infrastructure spending. When Nvidia’s margins compress or guidance disappoints, it raises questions about AI monetization and whether the buildout will sustain.

This dynamic makes Wednesday’s report critical for anyone invested in AI stocks, not just Nvidia shareholders. The company’s quarterly performance and forward guidance will shape sentiment across semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, enterprise software, and AI application companies. Three aspects of the report deserve particular attention as investors assess the AI market’s health heading into the rest of 2026.

Data Center Revenue and AI Demand

Nvidia guided for $65 billion in total revenue for the fourth quarter on its last earnings call. Meeting or exceeding this number is always the first question on investors’ minds, with guidance for the next quarter equally important. But the headline revenue figure only tells part of the story.

Most of Nvidia’s revenue comes from its data center division, which supplies the key hardware—including graphics processing units (GPUs) and servers—to data centers that hyperscalers depend on to run their AI models and solutions. Factors within this division gauge broader AI demand more accurately than total company revenue.

Investors will focus on sentiment and demand for Nvidia’s most powerful GPUs, called Blackwell, and how effective the new technology has been at training AI models. Will the extraordinary demand that management has claimed historically be reflected in actual numbers? Last quarter, CFO Colette Kress said Nvidia sees a $500 billion opportunity between that quarter and the end of 2026 for Blackwell and its next GPU model called Rubin, with future aggregate demand likely to increase.

Whether this projection holds—and management’s language and excitement around the potential opportunity—will signal if AI infrastructure spending is accelerating, maintaining pace, or beginning to moderate. The hyperscalers have announced record capital expenditure plans for 2026, but Nvidia’s results will show if those commitments are translating into actual GPU orders and deployments.

The Blackwell generation represents a significant architecture advancement over prior Hopper chips, offering substantially more compute power and energy efficiency. Adoption rates and customer feedback will indicate whether AI workloads are scaling as expected and if the performance improvements justify the infrastructure investments hyperscalers are making.

Management commentary about customer conversations, pipeline visibility, and supply-demand dynamics will matter as much as the reported numbers. Nvidia has consistently indicated that demand exceeds supply for its most advanced chips. Any shift in this dynamic—either supply finally catching up or demand moderating—would have major implications for how investors value the AI infrastructure buildout.

Pricing Power and Competitive Position

Pricing power indicates a company’s competitive position in a specific market. Nvidia has dominated the chip and AI hardware space, leading to incredible margins that reflect both technological leadership and supply constraints. However, competitive dynamics are shifting as other companies—including the hyperscalers themselves—design their own chips. Some investors are concerned about whether Nvidia’s competitive moat will sustain.

In the nine months ending October 27, 2024, Nvidia generated an operating gross margin over 76%. But for the same time period in 2025, that number fell to 69.5% as the company dealt with higher input costs. However, Nvidia showed improvement more recently, generating an operating gross margin of 73.6% at the end of last quarter. Management’s goal is to exit fiscal year 2026 in the mid-70s.

Whether the company achieved this target and what management’s guidance is for margins in the upcoming fiscal year will reveal competitive dynamics. Margin expansion suggests pricing power remains intact despite competitive pressures. Margin compression could indicate that hyperscalers are negotiating harder as they develop internal alternatives or that competition from AMD and other chip designers is intensifying.

The hyperscaler chip development efforts—Google’s TPUs, Amazon’s Trainium and Inferentia, Microsoft’s Maia—are specifically designed to reduce dependence on Nvidia and lower AI infrastructure costs. While these chips currently represent a small portion of total AI compute capacity, their existence creates pricing pressure and gives customers negotiating leverage.

Nvidia’s response has been to maintain technological leadership through rapid innovation cycles. The Blackwell architecture’s performance advantages over alternatives need to be substantial enough to justify premium pricing. If margins hold in the mid-70s despite competitive pressures, it suggests Nvidia’s chips remain differentiated enough to command pricing power. If margins compress toward the high 60s, it could indicate that competitive alternatives are becoming viable for more workloads.

Management commentary about competitive dynamics, customer feedback on Blackwell versus alternatives, and how Nvidia is thinking about pricing strategy will provide insight into the company’s long-term margin profile. This matters for Nvidia shareholders but also for anyone invested in AI infrastructure, as it signals whether the economics of AI compute are improving or deteriorating.

The China Situation

Another major aspect of Nvidia’s business that investors need an update on is operations in China. For much of 2025, the company could not sell older versions of its chips to businesses in China due to U.S. government restrictions. Huang has spent time lobbying in Washington, D.C., and appears to have made progress, though the news seems to change constantly.

In December, Huang appeared to have struck a deal with the Trump administration that would allow the company to sell its H200 chips in China, with the U.S. government receiving a quarter of the money from sales. But as of early February, the administration was still conducting a national security review of the deals and the customers Nvidia would be selling to. Meanwhile, Chinese regulators are also expected to have conditions regarding the sales if the U.S. approves them.

The stakes are enormous. Last August, Huang said the Chinese market would have been a $50 billion annual opportunity for Nvidia last year had it been fully open. He also said he could see this opportunity growing 50% per year. Nvidia is currently not assuming any revenue from China in its fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter guidance, so any resolution that allows sales would represent significant upside to current expectations.

The China situation creates both opportunity and uncertainty. If restrictions are lifted and Nvidia can sell advanced chips into the Chinese market, it would represent a major revenue stream that isn’t reflected in current guidance or Street estimates. This could drive meaningful upward revisions to 2027 projections and support valuation expansion.

However, the geopolitical complexity creates risks beyond just current restrictions. Even if sales are approved, they could be restricted again based on shifting political dynamics. The profit-sharing arrangement with the U.S. government would reduce margins on China sales compared to other markets. Chinese companies might accelerate development of domestic chip alternatives if they view Nvidia supply as unreliable.

Management commentary about the China situation—current status of approvals, expectations for when sales might resume, potential deal structures, and how they’re thinking about the opportunity—will provide crucial context for modeling Nvidia’s growth trajectory over the next few years.

What It Means for AI Investing

Nvidia’s earnings matter beyond the company itself because they provide the clearest read on AI infrastructure spending—the foundation supporting the entire AI investment thesis. If data center revenue meets or exceeds the $65 billion guidance and management maintains optimistic commentary about Blackwell demand, it validates that hyperscalers are following through on announced capital expenditure plans.

Strong results would support the broader AI stock universe. Cloud providers benefit from infrastructure deployment. Enterprise software companies building AI features can point to sustained investment in underlying compute. AI application companies can argue that the infrastructure buildout will eventually support their scaling.

Conversely, if Nvidia disappoints on revenue or guidance, or if management sounds less enthusiastic about near-term demand, it would raise questions about whether AI spending is moderating. This would pressure valuations across AI-exposed stocks as investors reassess the pace and scale of AI adoption.

The margin situation particularly matters for understanding AI economics. If Nvidia maintains mid-70s margins despite competitive pressures, it suggests AI compute remains scarce and differentiated—supporting premium valuations for the entire AI infrastructure stack. If margins compress, it could indicate that AI compute is becoming commoditized, which would pressure valuations for infrastructure providers while potentially benefiting AI application companies through lower costs.

The China situation adds a wildcard element. If Nvidia provides positive updates about potential market access, it would represent meaningful upside to current models and could drive broader market optimism about AI growth extending into previously restricted markets. If the situation remains unresolved or deteriorates, it removes a potential growth driver and increases geopolitical risk perceptions.

Nvidia currently trades around $191 with a $4.6 trillion market cap. The stock has been volatile in recent months as investors debate whether AI infrastructure spending will maintain its extraordinary pace or begin normalizing. Wednesday’s earnings report won’t definitively answer this question, but it will provide the most important data point yet for 2026.

For investors positioned in AI stocks, the key is understanding that Nvidia’s results will drive sentiment across the sector regardless of individual company fundamentals. Strong Nvidia results could lift all AI boats. Disappointing results could pressure valuations even for companies executing well. This makes Wednesday’s report essential viewing for anyone with meaningful AI exposure in their portfolio.

The conference call between Huang, management, and analysts will likely matter as much as the reported numbers. Huang’s commentary about customer conversations, technology roadmaps, competitive dynamics, and market opportunities has historically moved markets and shaped narratives about AI’s future. His perspective on where AI infrastructure spending is heading and what it means for the broader technology landscape will influence how investors position for the rest of 2026.



NEXT: